Thursday, December 4, 2008

Non-Barbies Banned.

Might I begin by stating that Barbie is the epitomy of class and beauty. She currently holds every job imaginable, raises all of her sisters and their friends, has babies without actually having to be pregnant, has a hot dream boyfriend (although Ken has been lacking in sex-appeal since the late 1970's), and all the while maintains a perfect body that gets sexier as she ages. I'm sure that many of you have noticed a total NON-Barbie bouncing onto the scene lately called Bratz, however, by the looks of them, I could think of a more appropriate "B"-word. Today I ran across a little article that Mattel (the makers of Barbie) filed a lawsuit against MGA Entertainment and won 100 million dollars. They have also requested that all Bratz dolls and anything affiliated or associate with them be impounded and destroyed. And to that I say Halelujah praise Jesus Joseph Mary and all the cattle. (You can read about Barbie's victory here.)
The creator of Barbie originally designed Bratz, and I'm wondering why she didn't later step back and think, "you know... this is the worst idea I've ever had. CLEARLY the world needs none other than BARBIE. And who wants their little girl to play with a doll who looks like a porn star anyway?." Quite obviously she should have immediately destroyed those documents, but instead she sold them to MGA Entertainment. Now, I would like to hail the creator of Barbie for all of time, and hate to think that she, with her high class, beauty, and brains, would ever think that it might be remotely acceptable to put a skanky, fat-lipped, stripper-looking chick up next to BARBIE and call it a day; So I'm just going to blame it on PMS.

1 comment:

Bonnie said...

OMG you CRACK ME UP! I read this to Brandon and he just looked at me and said, "I guess you had to be there?" Whatev...I think you're hilarious!